Powered by Bravenet Bravenet Blog

Subscribe to Journal

Tag Board

Gömlek... Free style t-shirt club T-Shirt T-SHIRT... F.b polo shoes women Ayakkabı Babet... Calvin klein Kadın Gözlük Unisex Gözlük Erkek Gözlük... Despina vandi: Gömlek... Free style t-shirt club T-Shirt T-SHIRT... F.b polo shoes women Ayakkabı Babet... Calvin klein Kadın Gözlük Unisex Gözlük Erkek Gözlük... Despina vandi
download wallpaper HD: great thanks to be here,download wallpaper HD
wallpaper background HD: nice to be here, visit wallpaper background HD
porno: en seçkin porno videoları burada ya sen neredesin?
Akümülasyon Tankı: Makina Isı ve Buhar Sistemleri, Hidrofor ve Genleşme Tankları, Buhar Kazanları, Buhar Jeneratörleri ile Akümülasyon Tankı üretim merkezi.
Twitter Takipçi Satın Alma: Twitter bir çok firma ve kişisel insanlar tarafından kullanılan gelişmiş bir sosyal paylaşım sitesidir. Bir çok açıklama,günlük hayatta yapılan etkinlikler,buluşmalar,görüşmelerin açıklandığı twitter her geçen gün yayılmaktadır.
Obat Pembesar: Obat Pembesar
Online Shopping Service: Online Shopping Experience Your Life
Peace Travel Services: A Wonderful travelling experience
Home Design Ideas: Comfort living with a beautiful home
Online Education Services: Empowering students to succeed
Online Business Clients: Small Business Branding Tips
Online Education Research: What You Should Know About Teaching Special Education
Home Modern Decor Ideas: Getting Real Estate for Your Family
Guerra Automotive: Hottest Sports Car Brands
Automotive Generation Drives: Tips aback Affairs Sports Cars: Accede Assurance Features
Virtual School for Your Child: Education Savings Account
Fashion Style Guide: Home Beauty Tips Make You Prettier and Richer Too
African Travel Tips: Picking the Best Rifle
Perfect Digital Solution: Sanyo Small HD Cams
The Art of Charm School: Some Alternatives to a University Education
Small Business Enterprises: The Power of Small Business Lunches
Tips for Personal Shopper: Natural Beauty Tips for Women
City Furniture Tips: How Home Inspections Benefit Owners, Sellers And Buyers
Women Site: Shopping for Bells Favors
Space For U'or Fashion: Examining Your Acquaintance Lenses
Entertaiment Famillyan: Picking Your Dream Design
Health Corner's: Alternative Cure For Stroke Survivors
Automotive Service: Make Individuals Stop And Gaze
Enhance Your Productions: Spruce up Your Business
Family Health Services: The Basics Of Brushing
The Education Center: CNA Acceptance Assay – What to Know
Fashion Update: Tips For Selecting The Best Array Charger
Health For Live: The “Quick Weight Accident Diet” Trend Disadvantage
Food Corner's Site: Coffee Machines At Home – Are They A Decay Of Time?
The Entertainment Today: Universal Studios Tours – Nickelodeon Blast Zone
The Business Buying and Selling: Flip Graphs -Fruitful Presentation Apparatuses
Health Alternative Site: Yoga for Modern City Life: Yoga is now a Lifestyle
The Workshop Creations: Details About The Rising Investments In Mexico
Forum Ensah Entreprises: Attaining Your Full Potential through Historic point Instruction
The Corporate Strategies: More Information On Professional Indemnity Insurance
The Education Today: College Scholarships Application
Home Buying: Pool Accessories: Where You Can Buy Them
The Beautiful Home: Decorating A Follow Cottage
The Minimalist Home: Quality Carpet Cleaning Service in Liverpool Area
Site Home Appliances: Bathroom Adjustment Supplies: Your Affairs Options
Business Secrets: Presentation Organizer Printing: Making an In number Initial introduction
Business Site: Thing Business people Need to Ponder C-Level Chiefs
The Entertaiment Today: Toe dance Move Classes for All A really long time
The Modern Women: Instructions to Keep Hands Supple

Please type in the four characters shown in the black box.

Tuesday, June 18th 2013

9:32 AM

New Post Up At Just Four Guys: Evolutionary Incentives: Why Women Are Going For Badboys and Players Instead of Stable Providers

This just in over at JFG: Evolutionary Incentives: Why Women Are Going For Badboys and Players Instead of Stable Providers. It's an excellent post by JFGer HanSolo, who examines the current mating landscape of contemporary American life through the lens of Evolutionary Psychological theory. This is intended as a "part one" of an ongoing series of posts by him in this regard, and I have expressed a desire to contribute to his series with a post of my own on a related topic, the "Sexy Sons" theory and how it relates to the Black community. My post on the matter should appear, soon. 

In the meantime, checkout Han's post and feel free to comment!

Now adjourn your arses...

The Obsidian


0 comment(s) / leave comment

Monday, June 17th 2013

7:29 AM

Happy National Throw Black Men Fathers Under The Bus Day!

NOTE: This originally appeared last week at Very Smart Brothas. Unfortunately the link cannot be posted due to technical problems with their commenting system.

"I love it when you call me Big Poppa..."
-Notorious B.I.G.

Good morning Panama, everyone,
*Stay tuned for a special announcement later this morning*

And now, for our Feature Presentation...

A most timely topic, and gives me both the chance to hold forth as I do every impending Father's Day, but as well, it gives me the chance to present to the Grand Assembly, for your consideration, the newest/latest from Philadelphia Weekly:

'Doing the Best I Can' talks with poor urban dads about unwed fatherhood'

The article is basically a longform excerpt from the book Doing the Best I Can, which focuses on the lives of more than 100 inner city dads over the course of some seven years; it is a companion piece of sorts to the critically acclaimed sociological study, Promises I Can Keep. I had the chance to speak to the authors of the latter when it came out back in 2005, and asked them point blank as to whether they ever had interviewed the dads; they stammered and hemmed and hawed and admitted that they hadn't. 

I am glad that I played a role in getting them to do up this latest effort. 

The Afrosphere is rife with all manner of focus and attention, often to a nauseatingly doting degree, on its Bougie/Buppie Classes and their oh-so-serious relationship woes - coaches, analysts, bloggers, writers, journalists, scholars, vloggers, dramatists and more - a veritable army of them - are at the Bougie/Buppie Class' beck and call to cater to their every whim, or need (and despite all this, they STILL can't seem to get together and make whoopee - more on this point below), to such an extent that the virtual total absence of ANY such focus on the subjects of Edin's books looks ridiculous in comparison. Of course, the denizens of the Afrosphere have absolutely no problem in clowning their inner city "Ratchet" brethren for merely existing. 

And so, as per usual, it is left up to Whites to take up the matter that the Bougie/Buppies are just too self-absorbed to give a hoot about. 

Let's share a few excerpts of this most excellent piece, shall we?

Here's one:

"Across the political spectrum, from conservatives like former U.S. education secretary William Bennett to President Barack Obama, unwed fatherhood is denounced as one of the leading social problems of our day. These men are irresponsible, so the story goes. They hit and then run—run away, selfishly flee, act like boys rather than men. According to these portrayals, such men are interested in sex, not fatherhood. When their female conquests come up pregnant, they quickly flee the scene, leaving the expectant mother holding the diaper bag. Unwed fathers, you see, simply don’t care."

Ahh, who could forget our Black President's now routine excoriation of Black Men (Doing the Best I Can, by the way, makes the point that the issue of unwed, poor dads AIN'T JUST A BLACK THING, but we all know Obama got serious Daddy Issues - right?) along these lines - taking time out of his campaign schedule in his first bid for the Presidency on Father's Day 2008, stopping at a Chicago Black church to upbraid Black Men for "hitting and running" - or his the line in his State of the Union address earlier this year about how a "real" Man raises a child instead of merely making one; or his finger-wagging lecture only weeks later, to a crowded school gymnasium, about, you know, if only there were more Black Men stepping up to the plate, there wouldn't be, you know, so many Black people getting shot (please note that Obama didn't make the same case in his heartfelt, tear laden address in Newtown - Adam Lanza came from  broken home too, dontcha you know). To date, Obama retains the record of being the only Presidential candidate who has thoroughly insulted his core constituency while running for Office - and still got elected(!). He truly is a first...

Let's see some more excerpts:

"The Vanishing Family went on to win every major award in journalism. Those commenting publicly on the broadcast were nearly unanimous in their ready acceptance of Timothy as the archetype of unmarried fatherhood. Congressional action soon followed: In May 1986 Senator Bill Bradley proposed the famous Bradley Amendment, the first of several of “deadbeat dad” laws aimed at tightening the screws on unwed fathers who fell behind on their child support, even if nonpayment was due to unemployment or incarceration. Only a lone correspondent from Canada’s Globe and Mail offered a rebuttal, fuming that Timothy “could have been cast by the Ku Klux Klan: you couldn’t find a black American more perfectly calculated to arouse loathing, contempt and fear.”

That's right, folks - the Bradley Amendment - which was the precursor to the Welfare Reform laws of the Bill Clinton-era 90s - was designed specifically to target and scapegoat poor Black Men dads. 

The more things change, the more they stay the same, hmm?

In our continuing mission to foster a true and real conversation obtaining on S8xual Politics as it relates to Black America, and as well our intent to highlight the numerous and flagrant hypocrisies surrounding these issues, we simply must ask some tough questions as National Excoriate Black Men Daddy Day 2013 approaches:

1. Why are we so intent to present the issue of unwed and poor fathers, solely in a Black Male light?

2. Why is President Obama - who is a Liberal's Liberal and who has made his advocacy of Protected Groups such as Women, Gays and the like a matter of public record, so willing to throw Black Men wholesale under the bus?

3. Why aren't there any Black scholars doing the work that Edin, Kafalas and Nelson have and are doing? 

4. Why is the Afrosphere so mum when it comes to offering relationship coaching services, attention and focus to those who need it most - the Black lower/working classes? 

Finally - as noted above, one has to note the fact that while the Buppie set has access to the latest in coaching and the like, they remain mired in not being able to move the ball forward; while their lesser brethren, for all their real problems and challenges, still manages to find each other and bring on the next generation of African Americans. The astute among us would compare and contrast, and meditate a bit on this. 

Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of Irony.

Happy National Throw Black Daddys Under The Bus Day!

Now adjourn your arses...

O.
0 comment(s) / leave comment

Friday, June 14th 2013

9:34 AM

New Post Up At Just Four Guys: Charles Ramsey Proves that it Doesn’t Pay to be a “White Knight”

You can see it here. 

More to come soon, I'll keep everyone alerted as to when new JFG posts by yours truly and the rest of the JFG go up. 

Head on over there and comment!

Now adjourn your arses...

O.
0 comment(s) / leave comment

Thursday, June 13th 2013

10:17 AM

Just Four Guys

"Necessity is the Mother of Invention, indeed..."

I would like to take this time to make the following announcement:

In a joint venture with three other highly committed and talented Men, I am pleased to introduce everyone to the Manosphere's newest contribution: Just Four Guys! 

As you can see, the place is still brand spanking new, and we DO have posts ready to be published; we're just waiting for our Chief Editor to put them up. Simply put, JFG is a collaborative effort on the part of, well, just four regular guys, who grapple with the Big Questions of our time; such as:

1. What does it mean to be a Man, in early 21st century American life?

2. How, exactly, has Feminism benefitted the everyday guy? 

3. Is Feminism, an unmitigated Good? Or does it have any downsides - and if so, what? How? 

And many more!

I truly do hope you will join me and my compatriots Han, Morpheus and Ted, for what will most definitely be one heck of a ride!

Let's roll...and stay tuned for more...

O.
0 comment(s) / leave comment

Tuesday, June 11th 2013

6:46 PM

Everyone's Favourite Miss Clever Little Silly Returns

"Time, as always, will tell the tale."
-Obsidian Maxim #29

*Steps up to the plate, knocks off the cleats with his bat, points to the rafters*

As I awoke from my restful slumber this morning, I was greeted by an avalanche of emails from just about errbody in the Afrosphere: "O-Man, did you see this?" - "Obsidian, you gotta check this out!" - "O, OMG, the Swirlers are going in on Champ and Panama!!!" - and so forth. 

At issue? The argument that Black Women, writ large, are shooting themselves in the foot by seeking higher educations at the expense of seeking marriage instead. So sayeth one Ms. Jamila Akil, senior editor of the website Beyond Black & White, a website dedicated to equal parts promotion of the Swirling lifestyle (read: Black Women/White Men) and equal parts wholesale denigration of Black Men everywhere, forever and ever, Amin. Ms. Akil, whom I refer to as Ms. Clever Little Silly, nor her "boss" Ms. Christelyn Karazin, are by no means strangers to yours truly; indeed, I have crossed sabers with both in the not-too-distant past (links in this regard to follow; stay tuned). No, scratch that - it was more like them bringing a dollar store Swiss army knife knockoff to my gunfight. Nobody has ever accused either ladies of being in possession of formidable grey matter and I suspect nobody will anytime soon; but, having said that, Time does have a way of honing even the dullest of minds. In this, Ms. Akil seems to have (finally!) wisened up to at least some important, if harsh truths of our time. 

Let's count the ways, shall we?

1. Ms. Akil is correct to point out two highly salient facts - that Black Women are indeed going off to university in record numbers, more than anyone else; and that Black Women are indeed the least partnered Women in contemporary American life. Additionally, she's right to note that many Black Women may be seeking higher educations in a bid be in a better position to provide for themselves (and their children - educated Black Women have the highest rates of out of wedlock births than any other educated Woman cohort - Ms. Akil AND Ms. Karazin, are both living proof of this) in the light of their inability, or unwillingness, to secure hubbies (a recent study on this was done that appeared in the Daily Mail of London, UK, by the way; if anyone out there can find the link, post it in the comments and I'll link it in this article. Thanks!), intuitively knowing their relatively weak mating market position. However...

2. What Ms. Akil doesn't seem to understand - or want to admit - is that there are just a few more moving parts to this puzzle. For while it may be true that Black Women may be seeking educations as a hedge against finding a hubbie, and that this strategy may prove wrongheaded, what's left out of the equation is what Black Men Want - and by all accounts, those Black Men who are most in a position to acquire what they most desire, have a differing criteria in terms of mate selection, especially on the Put-A-Ring-On-It Wifey side of the ledger. It is now well documented that Black Men are themselves, increasingly delaying marriage, or stepping away from it altogether - so much so that it is no longer a matter of debate. The anecdotal - and empirical - evidence, is just too much to deny at this juncture. So, clearly, there are reasons - very real ones - as to why so many Black Men, from all walks of life, are quite literally, retreating from marriage. What are at least some of those reasons?

3. Well, what a lot of Black Women - especially those like our Ms. Clever Little Silly, either can't grok or refuse to own up to - is that Black Women of a certain cohort, tend to have personality quirks and deficits that impose high costs in terms of mating - costs that Black Men have increasingly, over time, like a frog in slowly boiling water, have decided are just too high to pay. The cost-to-benefit ratio, gets out of whack; the ostensible benefits of having a mate who brings potential resources to the table, just can't overcome the aforementioned personality deficits - which ARE real, and DO take a tremendous toll on a Man's emotional, mental and psychological wellbeing. 

4. Add this to the Age Factor, and other Baggage Factors - such as kids from a previous marriage or, more likely given the nature of the current discussion, the Baby Mama factor (particularly along the lines that Black Philo recently observed - that of Black Women making the conscious decision to mate with Black males who offer short term bennies, such as "sexy son" genes - and then switch to a longer term option with another Black male) - that makes marriage an undesirable option for many Black Men in our time today. 

5. Debt - again, Ms. Akil is right to note this very important point, and is one that is not at all lost on many Black Men, who, make no mistake about it ladies, DO indeed factor into their long(er) term mating calculus. Indeed, in my own life, I have requested of any potential applicants, three simple numerical matrices: Age, Measurements and Current Debt Ratio - all of which are then tabulated into a final potential mating score which impinges upon my final decision. Currently, many Black Women carry a formidable debt ratio load due to school, and since extended years of schooling must, by definition, correlate with higher ages, we come to the conclusion that many Black Women offer a lot of liabilities, but little in the way of assets. Add to the formidable school debt, which Ms. Akil again rightly mentioned, she leaves out the following: car note debt, house/condo/apartment debt, clothing and living-high-on-the-hog debt, and again, we arrive at a lopsided ledger, which, when added to a potential applicant's increased age, perhaps already having kids at a much earlier age (and thus potentially imposing additional costs on a Black Man; this is inevitable when considering a longterm arrangement, especially marriage).

The above five factors and points are only a few of the many that can and often will dissuade a not insignificant - and by all accounts growing number - of Black Men who are rightly reconsidering their options on the mating market. To be sure, all Black Men will not have expansive mating options - like anything else in life, some must make do with what they can get, while others may not be able to bargain for a mate at all. 

But the point, as Ms. Akil's own real life example clearly demonstrates, is made: Black Men are taking a long, hard look at the "lifescript" that have been handed Men historically in American life, and unlike their White Brothers - important to this discussion because, let's face it, Ms. Akil and Black Women of her ilk have made the case that the marital pickings are Whiter on the Other Side (despite relatively little in the way of empirical evidence to back this contention up) - have been silently voting with their feet in response. No, all Black Men aren't doing this; but the trendline, on so many fronts, is not only unmistakable; it's undeniable. However one may wish to slice it, more and more Black Men have made it clear, that marriage just ain't the deal it once may have been.

So, it may be a good thing that more Black Women than ever are seeking educational credentials of their own; in many ways, Black Women are the unlikely heroines of the Feminist Movement. 

But that triumph DOES come at a price - one which our Ms. Clever Little Silly makes clear in her recent article, and seems to have learned over the past few years of being out in the relationship-barren wilderness. Whether that price, is one that is well worth it to the Sistahood, remains to be seen...

...and I suspect we won't have to wait too long to know their verdict.

Now adjourn your arses...

O.

Suggested further reading:







4 comment(s) / leave comment

Monday, June 10th 2013

7:44 AM

Burning Questions Mailbag Monday

"Now we're two..."
-Batman Begins

As a result of my actions online (and off) at places like Very Smart Brothas, a not insignificant number of Brothas have contacted me behind the scenes to get my take on the Mating Game; this is a most welcome development, as it warms my heart to see my mission, that of assisting Brothas achieve their mating goals, whatever they may be, starting to bear fruit. 

One of the gents to get in touch with me in more recent days, is one Mr. TO'mas Que Fuego, who I came to be familiar with via my interactions on VSB. The following are a number of questions he asked me on Facebook (are YOU a Facebook friend of The O-Man? No? Then what are you waitin' for?), and has given his permission to reprint them here along with my responses:

"O man, what's happening? So first of all I wanted to say that the post about road runner males being smarter than human males when it comes to mating was funny but a lil sad. The bros need some help so I really dig your mission. You seem to know your shit as far as attraction and pickup and when I opened one of your links and saw that you mentioned Alan Roger Currie (who I'm a fan of) I wanted to see how you felt about that level of direct game. I'm personally trying to figure out which style fits my personality more as it seems like my mood is more determinant of which style works for me (I can be the charming charismatic one if I'm in that mood or the direct and even intense guy in the room if I'm in that mood). So in trying to figure out which style of seduction to employ I decided a mixture would be appropriate. What are your thoughts on that?"

O: First of all, thanks for the kind words! Second, yea, we Brothas would definitely do well to take a page out of the Jungle Book, that's for sure. And finally, I'm for whatever works, be that "this" method or "that" technique, etc. Besides, all methods will not work under all conditions and on all Women; Human Sexuality is highly context dependent and sensitive; so it behooves the Gamesman out on these streets to be aware of this and plan and deploy his strategies accordingly. 

As for Currie, my take is that there are two major styles of Game - direct, and indirect. Currie's focus is on the former, while, say, Mystery's is on the latter. Which is "better"? That's really a question of personal style, goals, etc. Direct Game has its strengths, as does Indirect Game, and for my money there really is no "better/worse" way of looking at it. Again it all depends on what one's mating goals are, and what kind of Women they're interested in. 

Third, some guys are better suited to picking one primary form or style of seduction and running with it, while others can deploy a kind of "MVA" (Mixed Venusian Arts) approach blending bits and pieces of various seduction styles and forms, emphasizing one type and minimizing another, depending on the situation. I've been known to use this myself, and it is not at all uncommon or unheard of. My series of posts on Game and how varied it can and often is, can give one some insight into these matters and I urge you to spend a bit of time reading up on that and thinking on its implications not just for your own particular situation, but how you can see the varying Game styles in the Men that you know as well. 

"Also I wanted to ask you how much the target mattered with Mode 1? I ask because a buddy and I determined that while it can be HIGHLY effective instantly with certain types of women (the ones who are most turned on by extreme boldness) but that it would run other women off completely. Women who would've otherwise been open to casual sex with you if you approached it more indirectly and with more finesse and subtlety. So I would ask if the individual target should have any influence on the style that I employ?"

O: Absolutely! Target selection is a much underrated topic that deserves a heck of a lot more focus than it currently gets, and which I will be addressing in due course, so stay tuned! But in the meantime, yea, Target selection is a prima facie example of the importance of Calibration - and many, many guys fail to do this, thinking again, that their hammer will work all the time because all they see are nails. Currie's style of Direct Game, or "Mode One" if you prefer, can and will most likely work on Women in particular contexts; for example, it's perfectly suited for the singles bar and niteclub environment, where the venue is by definition, a "wham bam thank you ma'am" kind of experience; such venues perclude more subtler versions of Game in an indirect sense - say, like at a poetry reading or cafe or lecture hall. In the former environments, things move rapidly for better or for worse, and therefore forms of Direct Game are best if for no other reason than because of this time factor. In environments where one has more time to work, Indirect Game can really flourish, and Direct Game can and will come across as "too strong". 

"Would it even be possible to tell which women would be more open to Mode 1 and which would be more susceptible to another approach but turned off by mode 1's overwhelming boldness and honesty? If it's possible to tell is it ever apparent immediately? If so I'd love to hear your perspective on differentiating the type of target you're dealing with."

O: Well, again, you can get a pretty good read on which styles or forms of Game are more likely to work with which Women depending largely on the venue you're in. Most Men don't pay attention to these things and often to their detriment, because Women pay A LOT of attention to these things, and for good reason. Because Women are physically weaker than Men on average, they have evolved higher attunment to environment and subtle changes in it. This is why Women on average are a lot more sensitive to various environments than are most Men. 

Simply put, Direct Game like Mode One works well on Women who are interested in short term mating, be that as an end of itself, or as a means of attracting potential longer term suitors. Such Women are therefore more likely to present themselves in environments that are more amenable to short(er) term mating, such as niteclubs and singles bars. Women who tend to attend other venues, like the aforementioned poetry readings and lecture halls, are more likely NOT to be interested in Mode One style approaches (there are always exceptions, of course), and are instead more likely to be interested in more straight ahead LTR type arrangements. Making a Mode One approach on a Woman in that kind of environment is highly unlikely to work. Indirect Game is much more effective. 

Thanks for taking the time out to pose these questions! Much appreciated.

Now adjourn your arses...

The Obsidian
3 comment(s) / leave comment

Friday, June 7th 2013

3:19 PM

The Art Of Peacocking, Revisited: Style & Defence

"This is my rifle, this is my gun, this is for fightin', this is for fun..."
-Full Metal Jacket

In my previous post on the topic, I made the case that Peacocking - the notion of conspicously standing out from other males so as to make it more likely that you'll attract the attention of (attractive) females, needn't be as difficult - or expensive - as some would like to think; that you can use something as simple as a cane, to do the trick. During that discussion, I also stated that in my particular case, the canes that I use are specialized ones that martial artists are known to use, thus giving my cane a dual-purpose: attracting attention from the ladies on the one hand, and giving me a weapon that hides in plain sight on the other. 

In today's post, I should like to extend these ideas a bit further, going into the area of Self-Defence, because it is my view that no Man's Game skill-set is fully complete without it. This makes perfect sense, from an EvoPsych standpoint when you think about it: everything you do or don't do, either helps you Survive and Reproduce, or it doesn't. Game, is the "Reproduction" aspect of Life; Self-Defence is the "Survival" part of it. 

To begin, I'd like to feature a comment made in the previous post by longtime O-Files reader/commenter, MaMu1977:

"As a young(ish) man who uses canes intermittently (long story short: multiple lower body surgeries), cane game is nothing to sneeze at.

I have three of them- a Caribbean-influenced shillelagh (Irish-style hardwood cudgel, but with Jamaican interpretations), a silver-headed walking cane and a sword cane (because I'm a nerd with violent tendencies.) I can ztill remember my first successful line, post-surgegy
Her-Wow, you're awfully young to be using a cane.
Me-True, but I do my best work on my stomach anyway...
Her-What do you mean by...Oh... Oh!"

MaMu's comment draws our attention to several points that I've been wanting to make since my original post that I should like to note now:

For one thing, the first cane he mentioned, the Shillelagh - also known as the Irish Blackthorn - IS actually a weapon. Way back in Irish history, blackthorns were longer and used as outright clubs - so much so, that the British Crown outlawed their use. So, the Irish shortened them to cane-length, which was a legal work-around British Law, but were still quite formidable in close-quarters combat, even against knives and swords, due to the unusually hard wood that they were made of. Therefore, of all the canes MaMu currently owns, this is the best of them from a purely self-defence standpoint, and I highly recommend those so inclined to consider this in their day-to-day use. 

MaMu's other two cane options, are for my money a bit more problematic, for the following reasons:

1. In the case of the silver-tipped cane, I'm not a fan of canes that have "moving parts"; this is yet another reason why I chose to avoid the "old guy medical canes" that are so ubiquitous today. Anything with moving parts, or in other words, is not made of a single piece of material, is more likely to break/fall apart during combat, and as a result opening YOU up to the real risk of serious injury or worse. I therefore recommend that if you're going to carry/use a cane, make sure it's made of ONE piece of material, be that wood, polyurethane, or metal. 

I personally prefer wooden canes, weighing around 3lbs or so; the standard wooden police baton, which is still in use in many parts of the USA and the world, weighs about this much. A solid, wooden cane of this weight WILL pack quite a wallop when used as a defensive weapon, which is precisely the point. Plus its solid, unlike the metal hospital canes, which are hollow and easily breakable in a combat situation. 

2. In the case of the cane-turned-sword, this is very problematic, not just for the reasons noted above (i.e., moving/separate parts) but also because you are now carrying a concealed, lethal weapon - which, from a liability standpoint, ain't good at all. Swords are illegal in most places, and making it concealed only makes matters worse; if you were to seriously maim or worse kill someone with it, you could very likely find yourself in the joint. For this reason, I do NOT recommend getting one of these kinds of canes, as they're very likely to be more trouble than they're worth. 

Now, having said all that, I personally prefer the hook-style canes - the hook provides numerous applications, such as making it much easier to perform trapping moves, "come hither" moves, and provides a built-in weighted end to the cane for use as a simple club. It also makes for a ready guard when using the cane in the manner of a sword, like fencing, and can also be used like the butt of a rifle - for example, when clocking someone upside the head or center of their chest. Other parts of the cane, such as the shaft, can be used in a short quarterstaff manner, making it highly useful for blocking and offensive moves. The tip-end (the end of the cane that you place on the ground) can be used in the manner of a bayonet, and trust me, it is VERY PAINFUL to get "poked" by such a cane when someone is applying their body weight behind it. When combined with other moves, a weighty wooden hook cane ain't no joke. 

Also, unlike the Irish Blackthorn, hook canes, to the minds of most people walking around, are still associated with the sick, the elderly and the infirm - giving the user a decided advantage. It is a formidable weapon that can hide in plain sight, which flies right under the radar in terms of the police and so forth - and also gives you an edge should you have to go to court to explain how and why you were forced to defend yourself. 

So, there's that. 

But everyone here isn't going to carry a cane, nor should they. Hence the second part of today's post:

Boxing.

Of all the many martial arts out there, to my mind, the Sweet Science is the easiest to learn, the most practical, and the most cost-effective. Any Man can learn the basics and doesn't require lots of equipment - just some gloves and a heavy bag, all of which can be bought for under $100. Simply fill the heavy bag up with sand and hang it in the basement or garage, put on the gloves and go to work. Purchasing a few books on boxing will be a great help, or simply watching some videos online will do the trick. Learning some of the basic footwork, types of punches and simple combinations of punches, will put you way ahead of most guys walking around out there. You want to develop first, WHERE to punch, then developing your punching POWER, then gaining equal punching power in BOTH hands, then developing punching SPEED, and finally, how to COMBINE various punches to back your opponent up - if not knock him out altogether. 

This is vitally important, because chances are that you will be facing multiple opponents - so being able to swiftly move around them, delivering flurries of powerful punches will enable you to move from opponent to opponent, stunning each as you go along. I cannot stress enough the importance of well-placed/well-timed punches!-they can and will make the difference between you coming out on the other side of an encounter relatively unscathed, and you winding up in a world of hurt or worse. 

Now here's the best part.

When you combine the use of your cane AND boxing, you now have a formidable mixed martial arts fighting style that ain't no joke at all - because you're able to get both the long AND short range aspects of self-defence in, you're able to even the odds considerably should you find yourself facing multiple attackers, and if you lose your cane for some reason you're still able to fend them off. In fact, your heavy bag can prove quite useful to your cane as well, honing your ability to strike with authority. 

Now, again, note how you can achieve all this without going in for lots of money - both my current canes cost $5 USD total, and like I said, you can get a bag and gloves for well under $100. Compare that to the cost of all manner of martial arts classes, equipment and so forth. Not bad, huh?

But there's something else - conditioning. 

Now I'm not against going to the gym - you can most definitely get a heck of a workout there. But in these hard times, you may not have the ends to do that, and for some of us, the time either. 

So, instead what I recommend, is doing things in the course of your daily routine, that also serves the purpose of keeping you in shape. Since my surgery, for example, I make it a point of taking morning walks - about 3 miles roundtrip from my home - and which takes me about an hour to complete, including a brief rest stop in between the going and return trips. Just doing that every day, will put you ahead of a lot of guys out there in these days of obesity and the like. In fact, I highly recommend pounding the pavement more than anything else, because that's a surefire way to get in shape believe it or not. Think about it, what does the military do more of than anything else? That's right, walking (marching), usually with a goodly amount of gear. So, you simply do the same thing - get a backpack and fill it with a lot of heavy books, or even rocks, and walk around with that. Trust me, if you're putting in anywhere between 5-10 miles a day, five-seven days a week, you WILL lose weight, and you WILL build up conditioning! In a self-defence situation, strength is important, but what is even more important is speed, flexibility, endurance and most importantly, timing - a smaller Man with all these things can and will defeat a larger Man who relies primarily on strength alone. I go out on my morning walks whenever the weather permits (i.e., if its not raining out), which usually amounts to at least three times a week, and sometimes the entire week itself - and I think it's fair to say, that being able to cover 3 miles in about an hour, with the use of a cane, is pretty good timing. 

Back to the cane: I recommend checking out some materials on FMA, as well as Hapkido and other various styles/forms of "Cane Fu" and choose those moves and techniques that best suit you and the kind of cane that you wish to use. It won't be that expensive, especially if you're checking them out online and definitely worth the time investigating and studying it. 

No Gamesman is complete without the knowledge and ability to defend himself. After all, what's the point in putting in all that work to attract the ladies, only to lose her because you can't defend her - or yourself?

Hmm?

Now adjourn your arses...

The Obsidian
5 comment(s) / leave comment

Wednesday, June 5th 2013

9:30 AM

An Obsidian Triptych: Part Three: An Open Letter To Ms. CamilleBlu

"No man likes a slut for long; only the worst type will marry one. And competition for men on the outside is 
rough."
-Sidney Poitier, "To Sir, with Love"

Part three, of our triptych ends with an open letter of sorts...

As to be expected, many of my daily commentaries appearing at Very Smart Brothas and other select outlets online and elsewhere, can and often do upset many of the lady readership, frequently eliciting charges of "misogyny" and the like. While I often find such sputtering, hystrionics and irate remarks amusing, there are times that a lady will say something in response to my arguments that are born more of frustration and/or exasperation, and wants to get a better handle on that which I have powerfully presented. And although I do not consider myself a "relationship expert", Black or otherwise, in the least, and while I consider my self-appointed mission being more to empower and enlighten my Brothas in the areas of life that matters most, if a lady approaches me with a concern, I cannot turn her away - especially if the cause of her stepping to me was my widely-read writings in the first place. 

So it was with a recent commentary on my part, which elicited the following response - and questions - by one Ms. CamilleBlu:

"camilleblu on 4 June, 2013 at 9:50 am said:
i have a serious question…so if i am self-sufficient and accomplished, mentally sound, in shape, and 
attractive, i am doing myself some kind of disservice by seeking a potential s.o. that mirrors (for lack of a 
better term) these attributes? i’m kicking my own @ss out the game b/c my standards are too high, 
correct? i should just be concerned with dating whatever joe blow comes my way and wants to give me 
the time of day? or is it ok for me to have some type of standard, but just not expect my male equivalent? 
and at the same time i’m supposed to do everything in my power to maintain/enhance whatever attractive 
qualities that i have while simultaneously lowering my standards tooooo…..what level exactly?? how low am 
i supposed to go?? so on one hand, women are kidding ourselves b/c the vast majority of us aren’t bringing 
anything of substance to the table, but really the substance doesn’t matter, b/c it’s all about being as 
beautiful as possible for as long as possible while we try to stay in the game to attract the lowest common 
denominator in men??"

My response is as follows:

Dear Ms. Camille,

In no way should you "settle" for a Man you don't want and/or are not interested in; the only thing that will result in this is two hurt people, yourself and the gent in question, of course. Your doing something like that is also a kind of robbery, in that you're taking a guy from a lady out there who might be pleased as punch to have him. So, by no means, am I arguing that you, or any other lady, settle for Mr. Joe Blow. 

Having said that, what I AM saying, and by now I hope I'd have made this crystal clear, that a ginormous problem in our time is that far too many Women have an overinflated estimate of their SMV (Sexual Mate Value), due to the many interventions that have come down the pike over the past half century, coupled with the vast and rapidly-gained-paced sociopolitical movements that have taken place over the same amount of time - this is why even Champ and Panama have entitled their book "Your Degrees Won't Keep You Warm At Night". It is their humorous attempt to say what I chose to impart with cold efficiency - if you're not Hawt, you need to stay in your lane. 

And, how do you know if you're indeed Hawt or not? The answer to that question, is very simple, my dear - simply note the calibre of gents orbiting you. Are they topshelf? Are the upper echelons of the ladies in  their milieu attempting to be part of their court? If so, congrats!-you're indeed the Sugar Honey Iced Tea. On the other hand, if this isn't the case, and you find yourself attracting more Toads than Princes, then what I'm saying to you today should give you pause. 

The other thing to consider is the fact that Time and Place matters - a lot. Let's take these factors in turn. 

Time: Women as a group, and on average, have the most bargaining power out on the open mating market between the ages of 18 and 32 or so; after that, said bargaining power begins to diminish, some more rapidly than others. When a Woman gets to be around the latter 30s-early 40s range, her bargaining power for "age appropriate" Men has greatly diminished, notable exceptions notwithstanding, of course (and this is especially the case if she's got kid(s). She can more easily work around this if she's a divorcee; if, on the other hand, she a Baby Mama, whew, that's gonna be a tough nut to crack, especially in the case of going for the more desirable Brothas.). 

In this case, their best bet is to go older, i.e., go for Men who are older than themselves - at least five years older, and preferrably upwards of a decade or more. Remember, one of the most powerful weapons in a Woman's seduction arsenal is her (relative) Youth; if you're a Woman who is older herself, you'll get the biggest bang for your buck by going for guys who are older than yourself. For example, I happen to know a Woman who is nearing 50 (and looks good for her age, I must say), who is mated with a Man who is in his early 60s (I think he just turned 60 a month or so ago). Both are happy as clams, because both get their hardwired needs met: he gets a relatively young chippie who's at least a decade (more like a dozen years) younger than himself; and she gets a Man with formidable experience in/with handling Women inside and out of the bedroom, who has considerable social status (had a TV show and is now a local talk radio personality, long political activist roots, etc, et al), who has nevertheless kept himself up healthwise and has other attractive qualities. A big problem with many Women is that they (1) keep thinking they're the same Woman they were some 15-20 years ago, and they're most assuredly not; and (2), they think that what makes for an attractive mate in their mind, is what makes for an attractive mate in the minds of Men, too - NOT, LOL. Please do not let the fellas fool you, because Men can and will LIE to you and tell you what you want to hear - being self-sufficient, sane, et al, only matters, IF YOU'RE RELATIVELY HAWT. 

The big problem Women who are a bit older have, are actually several, one of which I've outlined above; but here's another:

Your biggest competition is going to come from Women who are a full decade or more, than you. Luckily for you, being a Sista, if you're able to get a handle on the weight thing, you'll pull ahead of a great many Sistas today, and that goes for the younger ones, too. In fact, just being a dress size or two slimmer than most Sistas walking around, regardless of age, will make a huge difference. This point cannot be emphasized enough - being shapely (which is different from being "in shape", which, to my mind, connotes a "hard body" look that isn't particularly appealing to yours truly; your mileage may vary), i.e. getting that WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio)  right and all the other things that Sistas can do to make themselves look good, will really set you apart from the rest of the pack out there (for Brothas particularly, this WHR thing is HUGE - do whatever you gotta to get it. Wear Spanx, oldtime girdles, etc). *WEAR DRESSES*. Men. Like. Dresses. 

Period. 

Place: You gotta put yourself where the guys you want actually are. You can't be mad about attracting nothing but scrubs if you're where scrubs mostly be. And if you're going to be in a tough Black Female Market, like NYC, than you really have to be a high flyer along the lines I've noted above - because NYC is a Player's Paradise, let me tell you. For whatever reason, Women seem to have problems with going to where the Sex Ratio is a bit more favorable to them - they tend to flock to the big cities, like NYC, ATL, LA, Chitown, etc, where there will be far more Women to Men, then wonder why they keep getting Pumped & Dumped. 

Nuff said. 

Now, to the hard part - Settling. When I say "lower your standards" I DO NOT MEAN, you get with Mudfoot. I am saying that you have to take Human Sociosexual Dynamics into account. You, getting with a carbon copy of yourself only ensures you getting neglected at best, cheated on like Bill did Hillary, like Tiger did Ellen, like John did Elizabeth, at worst. You don't want that to happen, do you? 

A Woman should aim for a Man who's a point or two below her *on the looks scale*. Remember, a Woman's sexual attraction triggers are like an Astin Martin V12 engine, while a Man's sexual attraction triggers are like a Briggs and Stratton two-stroke one. So, let's say you're a 6 - you want to go for a guy who's a 4-5 in looks, and has other stuff that "hits the other cylinders", you see what I'm saying? This will ensure him being sexually attracted to you over the longhaul, because, YES, we are thinking that far ahead and extrapolating that in terms of Opportunity Costs Per Notch being given up. 

Now, what I'm saying here is particularly difficult for Black Women in particular, because they have a marked tendency to really go for above-average "pretty" Men - much more so than, say, Asian, Hispanic or White Women (and thus, yet another reason as to why it's so difficult for so many Black Women to get er done - see here for more on that...) - and I have a number of theories as to why that is - but for those Sistas who can grok what I'm saying here, they will notice things being a heck of a lot smoother for them overall than for their Sistas who cling to doing things the same ole way and thus reaping the same ole harvest of Pump & Dumps. Trust me when I tell you, getting with a guy who is as good looking as you, or worse, better looking than you, will only cause you lots of grief and drama. 

So, let's sum up:

1. No one is saying that you should get with Joe Blow or Mudfoot. 

2. Your accomplishments are not what Men care about. 

3. Looking good matters - a lot.

4. Being shapely - regardless of dress size - matters. A lot. A size 4 or a size 14 doesn't matter; what matters is you having as small a waist as you can pull off, while at the same time them hips and backside is bangin'. Spanx is your friend. 

5. The older you are as a Woman - and by "older" we're talking anything over 35 - the more competition you will face for Men among the Chippies. The good news, is since you're a Sista and most Brothas like Sistas and most Sistas have weight problems these days, you being just a dress size or two smaller/slimmer will give you an edge. Along with Sephora.

6. Men like Dresses. On you, not them. Make em classy - dresses that are too form-fitting/slinky gives the wrong impression. Sexy and Slutty are two very different things. 

7. The older you are, the older your guy needs to be. 

8. Location, location, location. 

9. You attract what you are. Think on it. 

10. "Lower your standards" means, getting with a guy who is one to two points lower than you on the looks scale. 

That's it. 

Good luck...and adjourn your arse...


The Obsidian
11 comment(s) / leave comment

Wednesday, June 5th 2013

7:50 AM

An Obsidian Triptych: Part Two - The Black Male Retreat From Marriage

The second in our special series of posts today, is informed by a recent post by Single Black Male contributor, Wisdom Is Misery: "What’s in it for Me: Black Men Avoid Marriage Longer than Every Other Race". (H/T: Adonis) As of Jun 3rd, this post of Wiz's garnered more than 200 comments, debating hot-n-heavy, the whys and wherefores as to the now well-documented Black Male skittisheness when it comes to jumping the broom. His post merits the kind of closer examination that only yours truly would be capable of. 

So, let's have at it.

First, consider the data; I'll let Wiz tell it:

"We can debate a lot of things but for the sake of today’s I’ve included a 2001 census table below (there may be a more recent table but I’m too lazy to look for it and the stats have more than likely only gotten worse) which shows that black men and women marry later than every other race. I already know some of you will dismissively say, “You can’t put an age on marriage!” and I’ll grant you that opinion. However, even by age 40, only 75% of black men will be married. The next closest, Hispanic men, is 86% by this age. Further, since men of all races traditionally ask women of all races for their hand in marriage, the delay in marriage is likely driven by men."

Wiz ends his piece by posing the simple, yet powerful question: "Today I have one simple question: Why are black men avoiding marriage longer than every other race?"

Well, my friend, and to paraphrase the Gipper, the answers are simple, but not necessarily easy. 

First, what Roissy/Heartiste refers to as the Four Sirens has a heck of a lot to do with it - simply put, Black Men don't need to marry as much as they used to in order to get all of their romantic, sexual, cohabitative and even reproductive needs met. If Black Men are able to stave off marriage longer than other Men in contemporary American life, it can only be because, at least in part, Black Women are good with it (keep in mind, that Black Women, regardless of their place on the SES ladder, have higher OOW birthrates than any other group in America by a leaps-and-bounds margin - and have, for decades now). It does take two to tango, and all that. 

But there are other reasons as well. Consider:

1. Deindustrialization of America's inner cities

2. Corporate mergers, downsizing, outsourcing and the end of the Era of the Pension and Gold Watch

3. Higher cost(s) of living (thus affecting Affordable Family Formation)

4. Astronomical price of formal education beyond highschool (and questionable prospect of it paying off years,
sometimes decades, after graduation - keep in mind, Blacks have higher college debt and make less, than everyone else)

5. Unintended - but nevertheless Ruinous - effects and impact of Welfare

6. Feminist Ideology warping the minds of Black Women

7. Many Black Men seeing firsthand the aftermath and toll divorce takes on other Black Men, creating a strong disincentive NOT to marry (or failing that, to stave it off for as long as possible)

8. And, finally, many Black Men having grown up seeing their dads in marriages that sucked, where said dads worked jobs they hated, did things they didn't like, gave up their dreams and frequently didn't get along with their wives. Contrary to romantic notions of "the strong Black Family back in the day" the reality was, at the least, equal parts Ike and Tina, as much as it was was James and Florida. What kept "the strong Black Family" together, wasn't romanticism per se...but, to be frank, The Man. Like it or not, Jim Crow wasn't all bad. 

Add to this the fact that, for Brothas on the lower end of the SES totem pole, their ability to woo Sistas and put a ring on it has greatly diminished over the past three decades or so, making them less attractive marital options in the eyes of their assortative Sistas (and which is something that is now being written about and discussed among Whites; see Charles Murray's "Coming Apart" and Hannah Rosin's "The End of Men" for more on this point), and, well, we get what we get. 

But, since SBM, like VSB and the vast majority of the Afrosphere is a venue that caters almost exclusively to the Bougie Set, let's not spend too much time fretting about the Charles Ramseys of Black America; what the Sistas really wanna know, is why those handsome, educated, eligible Brothas aren't walking down the aisle - right? 

Well ladies, as yours truly so often says, to ask the question, is to answer it - and indeed I have, on more than one occasion. Repeat after me: anyone, or anything, that is highly desirable, is also very likely to be in short supply - and as such, is in a position to demand their "price" - in this case, handsome, eligible, highly educated and professional Black Men who have, either naturally or studied, GAME, are able to get all the lovin' they want from Black (and other) Women without having to put a ring on it (or if they already have, they can get "extra" relatively easily), in some cases, indefinitely. Think George Clooney with a Denzel-tan. 

In short, and as longtime reader and frequent commenter Dragnet puts it so very well - there is little incentive for many Black Men - especially the kinds of Black Men so many Sistas want most - to tie the knot. If anything, the disincentives are just as numerous and depending on who you talk to, much more so. They can put off marriage for the same reasons a dog lifts up one leg to take a leak - because he can. 

Not pretty I know, but then, the Truth, rarely is.

Now adjourn your arses...

The Obsidian
3 comment(s) / leave comment

Wednesday, June 5th 2013

6:54 AM

An Obsidian Triptych: Part One - Hypergamy Overdrive Syndrome

Today we consider three distinct, yet interrelated issues that have garnered considerable interest in Black America of late. The first part of this triptych comes from yesterday's commentary at Very Smart Brothas, my usual hangout on the Web:

"People are uncomfortable placing a value on other humans. It offends our sensibilities. But the unfortunate fact is that mate value is not distributed evenly. Contrary to yearnings for equality, all people simply are not equivalent in the currency of mate quality. Some are extremely valuable—fertile, healthy, sexually appealing, resource-rich, well-connected, personable, and willing and able to confer their bounty of benefits. At the other end of the distribution are those less fortunate, perhaps less healthy, with fewer material resources, or imbued with personality dispositions such as aggressiveness or emotional instability that inflict heavy relationship costs."
-Prof. David Buss, "The Mating Wars"

Good morning Champ, everyone,
In this special edition of today's commentary, we pickup where we left off from yesterday's discussion while at the same time revisit a theme that I've broached previously here in the forum, and one that has seemed to have struck quite a nerve. 

So, let's dive right in. 

In addition to the problem Champ has highlighted (itself born of a comment made yesterday) and Buss' outlining of the crude and unfortunate, but undeniably, often painful, reality of Mate Value, there is something else that has hit American Women in general, and Black American Women in particular, especially hard:


Simply put, Black Women are victims of their own success (and of that of their White step-sisters, when you really sit down to think about it). How? Let me break it down for ya.

First, there's the fact that Black Women no longer need a Man, of any color, to feed, clothe or otherwise provide for her - and this isn't just true for the Bougie Set, this is true for the Ratchet Contingent as well. Today, in 2013, no Black Woman *has* to be with ANY Man she finds undesirable, *for any reason* - either she has the means on her own and borne of her own efforts to support herself, or she can get those means by way of the State to do the job. 

Second, many Sistas, being that they don't need a Man in order to survive, have in essence priced themselves out of the mating market. How? Because the Men that would have been their assortative equal (i.e., Sista 5 gets with Brotha 5, etc.) are no longer psychos8xually attractive to her because she can now acquire on her own what in a previous era he could have provided, and so she now sets her sights on Brothas who are higher up on the scale - which brings us to the next point:

Third, Sistas in our time are suffering from Hypergamy Overdrive Syndrome - a particular chimera of hardwired biological instinct mashed up with unleashed technological/political/social/educational/economic freedoms that are akin to a kid in a candy shop - think Willy Wonka - and as we all know happens when a kid is allowed to run amok in a candy shop, now don't we? That's right, they don't feel too good after eating all that candy - right? 

For more on this very important point, please share with me the following quote:

"Black women are far more "hypergamous" than other women. It is this wanton hypergamy that has led to a minority of black men completely controlling the dating/mating market in the black community. Before feminism, women were not allowed to express their hypergamy because it was looked at shamefully. If a man was a decent man and he showed through his actions that he would make a good husband and father, a woman was encouraged to "jump on it". Men understood that in order to have access to frequent sex they were going to have to marry. These two ideals made marriage necessary and made both men and women commit to the institution. Hypergamy was not acceptable since most women were willing to accept "average" men as being worthy of their affection. Hypergamy leads to promiscuity because the more women that are in competition for a shrinking pool of males, the more the women will need to put out.

Lots and lots of black women are having lots and lots of sex with different men in an effort to "lock one down". But she is being undercut by her fellow sisters who also want the same man. So she must add another possible man to her rotation who also has a series of women on his speed dial. Lather, rinse, repeat. Keep in mind the men range in socioeconomic status. "Keyshia" may exercise hypergamy amongst the ex-cons, dope boys and block huggers while "Pamela" may exercise hypergamy amongst the various educated, resourceful men in her social circle. "Tonya" may exercise hypergamy among the baller-type men who are in HER circle. Either way, there are only a handful of circles that black men can be in to have access to commitment-free sex. And most men are locked out for various reasons.

The created "male shortage", which really means a shortage of men that black women want to have sex with, has led to women "having" to share men and "being left" with babies while select men move from woman to woman. Black women's behavior in SELECTING mates directly affects our sexual behavior. If you cast a wide net for men, as the woman you can carefully work your way through your choices since a good number of those men will simply be flattered that you're even interested. You will not need to sleep with a lot of men and play "Russian Roulette" with your vagina. Some men may have a ton of women waiting in line, and you will know this fairly quickly, so you can choose to let him move along or you can decide to get in the back of the line and wait. 

I don't agree with the mantra that "all black women want thugs" but I do think that black women have a very narrow view of what a dominant man is. Even the most educated of black women have this view. If a man does not appear to be able to be "alpha-dominant" he is going to have a hard time getting attention from black women. Black men that fall outside that acceptable "alpha" paradigm often find themselves questioning whether it is them or the women they are surrounded by. Especially if said man can see that "other" men can have a varying range of personalities, quirks, etc. and still have women treat them with respect. This is why the BWE bloggers say black women need to be reprogrammed. On this point they are spot on. In order for black women to even consider nonblack men as mates, most of them would have to completely change their thought patterns on masculinity."
- Rashida Rashida,  "Black Women's Promiscuity - Our Dirty Little Secret":

In short, Black Women are basically shooting out of their league, more often than many of them will ever freely admit - and the Brothas they're gunning for won't wife them up because, to be frank, they can and eventually will, do better - as soon as their Beyonce comes along. In the meantime, they are more than fine with enjoying the goods offered up by the Middling-On-The-Scale Ladies, especially since they aren't too much of a demand in terms of time and resources (and if they try to drive a hard bargain, Mr. Brotha Big just bounces on to the next one). By the time it's all said and done, Priced-Outta-The-Market Sista will be past her prime, and really in a pickle in terms of what she can realistically hope to get out on the open mating market - hence those "curious" "Meet Markets" you've written about in the not-too-distant past, Champ. 

The SMP (S8xual Marketplace) has been seriously deregulated all up and down the chain, and Black Women in particular are paying a heavy price for it. Of course, we could fix things overnight if we wanted to, but we don't; and so, the Band, will play on.

This really is a very simple problem to spot, diagnose and treat, Champ. It is simply, a matter of Will on our part. 

And we have none. 

Now adjourn your arses...

O.
2 comment(s) / leave comment