This is fun and all, but how about a post on game?

@BL,
Sure, no problem! You know what, since you brought it up, you get to decide the topic:

What specifically, should I write about?

O.

"Taking it upon themselves to uplift the race has been a failed strategy for black women,"

-Not least of which that the Fedreal government and state doesn't offer free money and aid to do so.,

"not because black women have not poured their hearts and souls into the mission and made tremendous sacrifices on behalf of attaining the mission,"

-when black women attacked the Civil Rights Movement, father-led households and black men. Which is the real reason why there was no protestation when these same fathers were barred from them,

"but because the good that black women have done has been swamped by the negative effects of bad public policy."


-Public policy they both 1. endorsed and 2. benefitted from via gender bias and nuclear family and male hatred.

Most black females "Leaders" are the most evil anti-family, anti-male females on the planet. No other nuclear family has suffered such willful "strictly ideological" self-destruction all in the name of Marx, Engels and Lenin. You see it on every level and black women know it. They FUCKED the Black community and male children for expensive, preferential crumbs.

1.She Can't Cook: They abandoned it for fast food, no husbands, obese children that the First Lady has to now "feed". NICE JOB taking the children away from black males and giving them to the state dumbasses. You realize your the next to be eliminated from the "New" Family?!?...baby momma...

2. She's broke: Best part about the high numbers of black women going to college? Is the "Education Bubble". Serve's them, right with their arrogant, braggard asses.

3.She got a flat/no booty AND she Lookin' like a Dude:
lol.

4.She a Baby Mama: Bitches don't get married, don't stay married/high divorce, have very few kids as they love abortion and have put their "stock" in gov't largesse as opposed to nuclear families, successful tradition and babies to cover their retirement and legacy. Well you get what you beg for. Lack of utility for a long

Brah, heard of the TFL branch of the MRM? What would you tell this guy?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Xg8nek158w

As a man who might be considered "Mr. Charlie" because I'm a White man, I will try to add and not detract what you have written. When it comes to women with children I'm very old school in how I view them. Other Mr. Charlie's may have a new school view, but I admonish them to adopt my old school view, and you may see why below.

If the woman is a widow with the child it's minus one point much as it pains me to say this. I feel sorry for the widow because unless she is the one who killed her husband, it isn't her fault she found herself alone and with a child. The problem is the child is not truly yours when you marry her even though you may have thoroughly bonded with the child and he or she prefers you, the adult male fatherly person, to his biological mother. Anyone with enough observaton and wisdom may even be right to say that the child would be better off with the non-biological father than the biological mother, but it doesn't matter in today's world with the rarest of exceptions. It's difficult enough to maintain a relationship with your biological children or at least children percieved as your biological children even though in reality they aren't, when the woman can walk away with the children and usually get the courts and ploce to do much of or all of her bidding be it justified or not through VAWA, Violence Against Women Act, which essentially holds you guilty until proven innocent.

With the exception of never having to deal with the live biological father, you could apply everything I said above to divorced mothers and baby mommas. Remember all other things being equal or the same, I like many men rank widowed mothers higher than divorced mothers and baby mommas, and I would minus 2 points for divorced mothers and baby mommas. I'll explain why in a later post.

@DocLove,
Hey Man, thanks for stopping by - and for being a good sport wrt the "Mr. Charlie" thing.

I think what you said above is highly legitimate for you, and as I said in response to Bag Lady Desi (Hi!), I don't feel that it is my place to attempt to tell Men how to live their lives. Your requirements are your requirements and I see nothing in the least wrong with them.

Looking forward to "part two" of your post...

O.

I guess I should have come with a solution instead of just complaining :)

Lemme get back to you.

I'm late in following up, but I'm sure this will explain a lot. Thankyou to you, Obsidian, for declaring my points valid. I'll finish what I stated about widowed mothers. The problem with raising a widowed mother's child is it cuts down on the resources you have be that money or time or something else; and, the same could be said for divorced mothers and baby mommas. Any man who marries a widowed mother and takes on the responsibility of being a father of a half orphaned child not his is doing God's work in my opinion. I may be able to do this, but I consider it 99%improbable. I'm Christian and Catholic, but I've heard Mohammed, the man responsible for giving the Koran and founding Islam in Arabia took on widowed women and their children. Especially at that time, it was kind of him to do so as widowed women and half orphaned children without fathers would have had difficulty surviving without a man to provide and protect in a state which is closer to nature than what we live in which is artificiality propped up by the government in the USA. Remember, I'm an Army veteran of both Iraq and Afghanistan, and so I've seen what most Americans haven't which is man living in a more natural state. Afghanistan is more primitive and having man living in a natural state than even Iraq. When the wealth is gone largely but not exclusively to to misandry, the USA will have a horrific wake up call. We may be lucky to do as well as Iraq or better, and in my opinion with the current course we Americans won't have it as good as the Afghans have for as aweful as the Afghans have it for a whole legion of reasons one of which I've named.

Divorced women especially if they have children are bad news for all of the reasons I've named above plus a few more. Most of these women either married a badboy cad player or assinine type who made their ginas tingle, or they married an alpha who became betaized, or they married a beta chump whom they could take advantage of whether they were cognizan

Divorced Women especially if they have children are bad news for all the reasons I've named above plus a few more. Most of these women either married an Alpha badboy cad player assinine type who made their ginas tingle, or they married an Alpha who became betaized in marriage, or they marrieda beta whom they could take advantage of whether they were cognizant of what they were going to do before the marriage or after the wedding ceremony. They will blame the abuser men, but rarely themselves for getting themselves into a relationship with an abuser. Who chose the badboy assinine cad player type? Women did, and we see it ALL THE TIME. Not all women, but many do. They pass up good and nice men because it doesn't tingle their ginas. After too much abuse, the women end it, but never admit to themselves that they are responsible for getting themselves in the mess in the first place.

Marriage has a very strong tendency to betaize men. I'm not saying it will happen or that a certain amount of betaization in marriage is bad, but it is what it is. The truth is it's very difficult for any man to defend himself with VAWA and misandric culture being single and living on his own. It's more difficult when he's living with her or married. It's more difficult still to be dominant in the relationship for the men because of idiotic liberal progressive feminist laws and enforcement backed by the moronic neo-conservative chivalrous religious folks. A man signing up for marriage is signing up for indentured servatude(virtual slavery) in today's USA and other First World nations. Any time a woman wants to flip the script, she can. Please don't say my woman will never do that to me because I know what I'm doing. The law and the enforcement of the law is still against you whether or not she decides to use it against you or not. Why would any man would want to enslave himself more is beyond me.

I'll continue further down.

@DocLove:
I'm all ears...this just might turn into a blogpost in its own right the way you've been going at it, LOL. But seriously though, this is some good, provocative stuff. By all means, continue...

O.

I really meant for this to be shorter, but so much needs to be said. This is really a roughdraft, but feel free to use all of what I have written and am about to write on my posts concerning this article you wrote. I realize this is starting to sound like The Spearhead blog especially from the commentators on the articles there, but much truth can be found there even if one gets the sense that there might be too much whining there. Some of those men need to vent somewhere even though few care when men complain especially if they complain about women. Some of it is genetic and some is cultural as to why people don't listen to men who complain unless the threat of violence is used. Like President Kennedy said, if you will not allow peaceful revolution to be possible, violent revolution is inevitable. I really don't want violence, but I'm afraid we'll eventually end up there.

A woman will become angry if a man becomes too betaized or remains too alpha especially if he is abusive or cheats within the marriage. As I've said before, it's become more difficult for a man to remain Alpha when the the laws and enforcement can destroy him at any moment just because she called the boys in blue otherwise known as the police. God help the man if he reaches the courts because it often gets worse.

Then there are the women who marry the beta men rationally thinking he is a better choice for marriage. In many ways he is, but if he fails to tingle her gina, she can cut him out of her life and make him pay with assett losses, child support and alimony. Quite often she'll rationalize it as something else other than failure to tingle the gina whether he was a beta before she married him or turned into one when he was once an alpha after she married him. God help him if he turns into an omega too.

Game or lack of Game from the man is part of the reason men and women divorce. I'm not saying that there aren't other reasons for divorce because there certainly are. I'm not even sa

Where does all this lead concerning marrying divorced women with children? They are a bad bet because if the husband filed for divorce, one has to wonder what she did that he considered so horrific that he decided to leave her. In this day and age, divorce has been made to harm men emotionally, legally and financially in the overwhelming majority of cases. Virtually all men know this in first world nations especially in the USA. It is likely, 70%, that she filed for divorce. She usually "burns" herself in a divorce, but she "burns" tha husband and children more. She'll complain about him, the previous husband, but rarely recognize much less fix her faults within her personality which led to the dissolution of the marriage. Anyone who's been divorced previously finds each successive divorce easier to go through generally speaking. This is especially true if she filed first. In that respect it is similar to killing other human beings. The first is the most difficult, but it gets easier with each one. Most people don't learn from their mistakes either so much of the divorce statistics are repeat offenders such as Elizabeth Taylor. So as you can see in some respects, divorced women are worse than baby mommas. Baby Mommas were not the victims of "marriage murder" divorce nor were they the perpetraitors. It's bad enough when adults get burned in divorce but at least they volunteered for the marriage prior to the divorce, but the children never volunteered in any way to have their lives thrown into turmoil.

As you can see it's even more wrong when children get "burned" from divorce than when adults do. When a man marries a divorced woman, he is at an increased risk of getting a divorce from her. There are statistics which I don't have at the moment to back this up. Remember women have all the options to choose to get married or not just like men. They also have the right to pick who they marry without outside interferrence such as parents just like men do. Women also have been given more authority by the government than men to say shape up or ship out within marriage. The man is more likely to be punished by divorce than the woman.

Let's move on to Baby Mommas. You're still devoting your time and money as a man to raise someone elses offspring who is not yours. Usually the biological father is still alive unlike widowed mothers. What makes baby mommas worse than divorced mothers is with all the contraceptives available, they still got pregnant. Most of them were either negligent or more likely willfully got pregnant. It usually wasn't an accident like the contraceptives didn't work. Men have only one contraceptive, the condom. Women have more than that. Women can also get an abortion. I'm opposed to it on moral grounds as I consider abortion to be murder, but I aknowledge its an option for women that men have no say over one way or the other. My opinion is the accidental pregnancy rate and bastardy rate should be 5% or less not the American 40% bastardy rate we see now. It shouldn't be the Asian 14%, White 28%, Hispanic and American Indian 50% and Black 70% we see in the USA too. Having a bastard child is often an indicator of a careless woman or an unstable woman. Frankly speaking, I'd say this is more likely to be the case than she being unlucky. How good of marriage prospects are careless(reckless) or unstable women? My answer is not very good ones.

In our time in first world nations especially the USA, women have the right to choose and so do men. It is hardly socially unacceptable to not get married or not have children anymore. Even for those who choose to chastise you for not doing so can easily be rebuffed. Remember one thing: Feminism and misandry have made men the prize to get for commitment, marriage and children. Since women have in fact of how things really work greater social and legal status than men, it is primarily women's fault if their marriages don't work out. Most will say men are equal to women or superior to women in marriage, but don't believe their lies. They are usually decieving themselves too. Any married woman can threaten a man to straiten out or deal with divorce hell. A smart sane man knows you don't even want to be threatened with it. Any one with sense could tell you women that raising children with a partner is difficult enough. Having a male husband is usually the best way to do this. You chose to send your children's lives in a downward spiral when you decided to become a divorced mother or baby momma. Now their are good reasons to send men away, but this must be a measure of last resort. You should also ask yourselves how you got there and how are you truly going to compensate for a less than ideal situation for your child. You ladies need to ask yourselves why any man would want to marry you even if you were single? There's nothing in it for men anymore because they are not legally or socially protected and neither are the children which is worse.

A Single woman with no children is rated highest. A divorced mother with children is next much as it pains me to say it. A divorced mother or baby momma are at the bottom. These days most divorced mothers aren't much better and some of them are worse than babymommas.

Most women may mean well when they marry you men. It doesn't always work out. The Divorce rate in the USA is 45% and would be higher but declining marriage rate

Most women mean well when they marry men. It doesn't always work out. The divorce rate in the USA is 45% and would be higher but declining marriage rates and shacking up have reduced from 50%, and it would be at 50% or higher if not for this. Women can be soulless sociopaths to men they are no longer in love with and often if not usually are. Actually they almost always become more difficult to deal with to one degree or another when no longer in love with the men. I'm done posting for now on why I share similar views to Obsidian, and have explained my reasons. If you have questions or comments, please feel free to say so.

The above Anonymous post is mine, doclove.

So what are numbers 6-10 on the "Wifey Aptitude Test" or are they simply for another post?